KIU Publications

Publications Archive

Explore research, reports, and scholarly works from the vibrant academic community at Kampala International University.

No matching results? Clear all filters to begin a fresh search.

Algorithmic Governance and Public Accountability:  Audits, Transparency, and Harm 

Author: Tarcisius Niwagaba 
Publisher: NEWPORT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT ISSUES IN ARTS AND  MANAGEMENT (NIJCIAM)
Published: 2026
Section: College of Humanities and Social Sciences

Abstract

Algorithmic systems are increasingly embedded in public administration, shaping decisions in areas such as social 
services, law enforcement, urban governance, and financial regulation. While these systems promise efficiency, 
scalability, and data-driven insights, their deployment also raises significant concerns regarding transparency, 
fairness, discrimination, and accountability. This paper examines the governance of algorithmic systems through 
three central mechanisms: audits, transparency, and harm assessment. It explores how algorithmic governance 
frameworks can ensure the responsible deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems while safeguarding public 
trust and democratic values. The study reviews mechanisms of internal and external audits, emphasizing the 
importance of standardized auditing procedures, performance metrics, and independent oversight to evaluate 
algorithmic performance and detect biases or unintended consequences. It further analyzes transparency practices, 
including data provenance, model disclosure, explainability, and governance records, which enable citizens, 
regulators, and stakeholders to understand and scrutinize automated decision-making processes. In addition, the 
paper discusses various forms of harm arising from algorithmic systems, ranging from individual-level 
discrimination and privacy violations to systemic risks that undermine democratic institutions and social cohesion. 
Drawing on international case studies from municipal governments and public service delivery contexts, the paper 
highlights both the opportunities and limitations of current governance approaches. It concludes that effective 
algorithmic governance requires multi-layered accountability structures involving policymakers, public 
institutions, industry actors, and civil society. Strengthening auditing standards, enhancing transparency, and 
establishing robust mechanisms for harm mitigation and redress are essential to ensure that algorithmic systems 
operate in ways that promote fairness, protect human rights, and uphold democratic accountability.