Abstract

This paper examines decolonial historiography through the interconnected dimensions of evidence, ethics, and 
archive politics, emphasizing the need to challenge colonial epistemological structures that continue to shape 
historical production. It argues that conventional archival practices have historically privileged dominant 
narratives while marginalizing Indigenous, local, and alternative knowledge systems. The study explores the 
conceptual foundations of decolonial history by emphasizing epistemic pluralism, methodological reflexivity, and 
counter-archival practices as essential tools for reconstructing suppressed histories. Furthermore, it investigates 
the ethical responsibilities involved in engaging with Indigenous and marginalized communities, particularly 
issues relating to consent, representation, reciprocity, and accountability. The paper also examines the politics of 
archives, highlighting how structures of power influence access, preservation, and interpretation of historical 
materials. Through selected case studies, the study demonstrates practical applications of decolonial 
methodologies and illustrates how community-centered approaches contribute to epistemic justice. Ultimately, the 
paper contends that decolonial historiography requires transparency, community validation, and inclusive 
methodological frameworks to create more equitable and representative historical narratives.